Jurisdictional Conundrum: A Critical Analysis of recent judgements on rental claims

The recent judgments of Justice D. S. Majanja in Civil Appeal No. E036 of 2022 and Justice Namisi in Civil Appeal E009 of 2022 have sparked significant debate in the legal world and rental market. The two judgments have shed light on the jurisdictional limitations of the Small Claims Court over rental claims in Kenya. This article will analyze the judgments and provide insight on the way forward.

In Christoffersen v Kavneet Kaur Sehmi T/A The Random Shop (Civil Appeal No. E036 OF 2022), the High Court observed that a claim before the Small Claims court must fit into any of the five categories of cases enumerated in section 12 (1) of the Small Claims Court Act, 2016. It held that a claim for rent arrears does not fall within the jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court, as it does not fit into any of the five categories of claims enumerated under Section 12(1) of the Small Claims Court Act. Justice Majanja emphasized that the court’s jurisdiction is strictly limited to the statute and that a court cannot “exercise jurisdiction exceeding that which is conferred upon it by law.” This finding effectively means that rent-related claims ought to be dealt with by the Environment and Land Court.

In Michelle Muhanda v LP Holdings Ltd (Civil Appeal No. E256 of 2023), Justice Namisi observed that a claim for rent and arrears is distinct from that of breach of contract relating to rent deposits. The court found that that the small claims court has jurisdiction to hear the appellant’s claim for refund of rent deposit as the claim relates to a contract for money held and received, which falls within the ambit of section 12 (1) of the Small Claims Court Act. The decision has cleared the way for tenants to take landlords to the Small Claims Court and claim their deposits upon relocating, and all proceedings shall be heard and determined on the same day or on a day-to-day basis until the final determination of the matter, which shall be within 60 days from the date of filing the claim.

Way Forward

In light of these judgments, several recommendations can be made:

  1. Legislative Review: The Small Claims Court Act, 2016 should be reviewed to clarify the court’s jurisdiction and provide guidance on the types of claims that can be entertained.
  2. Proper Pleadings: Parties must ensure that their claims are properly pleaded and fall within the jurisdiction of the appropriate court.
  3. Forum Shopping: Parties should avoid forum shopping and select the appropriate court based on the nature of their claim.

In conclusion, the judgments serve as a timely reminder of the importance of jurisdictional competence in the administration of justice.


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For bespoke legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances, please connect with your relationship partner or a qualified legal professional. For further information, please email faith.wamuyu@attorneysafrica.com

Addressing Inefficiencies in Property Rate Collection and Unlocking Revenue Potential

The National Rating Act of 2024 marks a significant step in reforming Kenya’s property rating and valuation framework. This law was introduced to address long-standing issues, which have been holding counties back from earning their full potential. A study conducted in 2018 by the National Treasury, with the support of the World Bank, revealed that county governments had substantial unrealised revenue potential, particularly from property rates. This catalysed the introduction of a new law to replace the outdated Rating Act of 1963 and the Valuation for Rating Act of 1956, which had failed to align property rates with the rising market values.

The Rating Bill was initially passed by the National Assembly in October 2023. It then underwent amendments in the Senate before a mediated version was approved in November 2024. It received presidential assent on 4th December 2024, marking the beginning of a legislative journey aimed at unlocking the revenue potential of county governments.

The new law encourages the use of modern technology to make valuations more accurate and efficient, ensuring that property values reflect the current market rates. Counties are now required to review and update their valuation rolls every five years, with a possible two-year extension if approved by the county assembly. A valuation roll is a list of ratable properties showing owners, their addresses, locations of land, tenure, acreage and assigned value.

To streamline operations, the Act creates the Office of the Chief Government Valuer, which will offer expert guidance and strategies to counties and the national government to promote best-practice on handling various valuation issues. It further establishes the National Rating Tribunal, which will handle property disputes quickly within 60 days, fostering fairness and efficiency in adjudication processes. In addition, the Act introduces measures to ensure accountability and equity in revenue collection. Property owners are required to pay rates promptly, with counties empowered to enforce payment through notices and, if necessary, the seizure and sale of properties with unpaid rates after a 60-day notice period. However, property owners may apply for rate remission and applications not acted upon within 60 days are deemed approved, providing a safeguard against administrative delays.

Further, the law excludes freehold agricultural land from its scope, focusing instead on urban properties and other rateable properties. Counties are encouraged to consider different property categories such as residential, commercial or agricultural when determining rates, allowing for incentives that promote good land use. Counties can also employ the use of private valuers to expedite the preparation of valuation rolls, preventing backlogs and alleviating the workload on government valuers to ensure timely updates.

This new legal framework is designed to address inefficiencies that have previously cost counties billions of shillings in lost revenue. By aligning property rates with market values, fostering responsible financial management and promoting transparency and accountability, the Act is set to transform county revenue collection, enabling better delivery of services and infrastructure development for the benefit of citizens.

The Act establishes a flexible framework, allowing county governments to use one of four major methodologies for valuing properties, customized to their specific areas, as specified in Section 9(2) of the Act. This is not a one-size-fits-all strategy, and here are the options:

  1. Annual Rental Value: This method focuses on the potential rental income of your property. It considers either the actual rent you could get or the equivalent of comparable rents in the open market. As the Act defines it, “annual rental value” means the amount arrived at based on the actual annual rent realizable or the annual equivalent of comparable rents. This method is most relevant when your property is used for rental purposes.
  2. Area Rating: This is a straightforward approach that calculates rates based on the size of your land. Counties can use a flat rate, a graduated rate based on acreage, or a differential rate based on land use. As the Act defines it, “area rate” includes a flat rate, graduated rate or differential rate adopted by the county government. This method may appeal to owners of larger land holdings.
  3. Unimproved Site Value: This approach values the land as if it were vacant, without considering any buildings or improvements Sections 7, and 9(2)(c)]. In essence, “unimproved site value” is the value of vacant land that does not include the value of any improvements. This method highlights the raw value of your land.
  4. Combined Approach: This method blends the value of the land with the value of any improvements Sections 7, and 9(2)(d)]. This offers a more comprehensive approach.

Before any of these methods are implemented, county governments must seek public input Section 10(1). This is not a mere formality but a key opportunity for land owners to shape how their property rates are calculated. Notices about proposed methods will be published in the Kenya Gazette and in at least two newspapers of wide national and county circulation, and will be circulated through electronic media, ensuring you get at least 60 days to make your views known Section 10(2). As the Act states, “Prior to the adoption of any form of rating, the County Executive Committee member shall, issue a notice of not less than sixty days inviting comments from the members of public Section 10(1)

National Rating Tribunal

A key feature of this Act is the establishment of the National Rating Tribunal Section 39(1). This tribunal is will hear and determine appeals and objections related to property valuations and rates, aiming to resolve issues within six months. The Tribunal will not be bound by the rules of evidence in the Evidence Act Section 42(2). If you disagree with the Tribunal’s decision, you can appeal it at the Environment and Land Court.

On Exemptions:

Not all properties will be subject to rates. The Act exempts certain types of land, including properties listed under Section 38 which include:

• Land used exclusively for public purposes.
• Places of public religious worship.
• Cemeteries, crematoria, and burial grounds.
• Public health facilities.
• Public educational institutions and libraries

However, these exemptions do not extend to properties used for profit or for residential purposes Section 38(3). The Act also specifies that places of public religious worship with profit-earning ventures are only exempt for the place of worship and that rateable property leased for foreign embassies are still subject to rates if registered under the rateable owner.,

Paying Rates Consequences of Default

The County Executive Committee Member will determine when rates are due, and you will be able to pay through authorised bank accounts or electronic payment systems, or by any other means prescribed under Section 15(2), and 16(1). However, it’s crucial to pay on time as the Act introduces stricter enforcement measures for defaulters under Section 19(2). These measures can include penalties, denial of county services, or even the creation of a charge against your property under Section 19(2)(d).

Relief for Those Who Need It

If you’re struggling to pay your rates, the Act provides some routes for relief. You can apply for a remission of rates, where a portion or the whole of the rates may be reduced Section 17(1). There are also possibilities for discounts and waivers of interest and penalties, though these will have specific criteria set by each county under Section 18(1).

Public Land and Contributions

The Act also addresses the issue of public land, with provisions for contributions in lieu of rates under Section 20(1). The National Land Commission will create guidelines for including or excluding certain public lands from valuation rolls [20(2)].

What Does this Mean for You as a Property Owner?

  1. More clarity and consistency: The Act aims to create a more transparent and consistent system for property taxation Section3(a).
  2. Increased public participation: You have a greater say in the valuation process as prescribed in Section 10(1).
  3. A structured dispute resolution process: The National Rating Tribunal offers a formal avenue for addressing disagreements by the Tribunal established under Section 39(1).
  4. Potential changes to your tax liability: Depending on the new valuations, your property taxes might increase or decrease.
  5. Stricter enforcement: Be prepared for stricter measures if you fail to pay your rates as provided under Section 19(2).

In conclusion, this Act is a huge step towards modernizing property tax collection in Kenya. Keep a close eye on updates from your county, as they will be creating their own specific legislation and regulations to implement this Act. This change not only impacts property owners, but also shapes how property ownership and responsibility is understood in Kenya.

0

CRUMBLING OF THE SYSTEM: THE STORY OF ARDHISASA

INTRODUCTION

Land in Kenya remains the single most explosive issue. It was a major issue in the quest for independence. The land question has over time been shaped by economic, political, social and legal parameters.

BACKGROUND

Two years after its launch, many Kenyans are already wishing for the entire system to be overhauled. This is the case with the National Land Information Management System (NLIMS) commonly dubbed ArdhiSasa launched in April 2021 by former President H.E. Uhuru Kenyatta.

The Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning coupled with the National Land Commission, county governments and other stakeholders developed the National Land Information Management System to address the challenges that were facing the existing system.

These included but were not limited to :

  • Loss of records
  • Destruction of records
  • Theft
  • Misfiling
  • Manipulation of land records

LEGAL FRAMEWORK

Under Section 6 of the Land Act (No. 6 of 2012), the Cabinet Secretary of the Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning is mandated to coordinate and manage the National Spatial Data Infrastructure.

They are also required to coordinate the development and implementation of a National Land Information System in collaboration with the Commission.

The Registrar of Lands is obligated under Section 9 of the Land Registration Act to keep the register and other necessary documents in a safe, readable, and trustworthy format, which includes, among other things, electronic files. On the other hand, Section 10 emphasizes, among other things, the public’s ability to access the register via electronic means.

In fulfilment of this role, the Ministry embarked on developing technologies, policies and putting up the necessary resources to promote the sharing of geospatial data throughout government levels, private and non-profit sectors, and the relevant stakeholders.

HOW IT WORKS

Essentially, NLIMS is an information system that enables the capture, management, and analysis of geographically referenced land-related data to produce land information for land administration and management decisions. The system integrates all operations of the Ministry of Lands’ line departments and provides a one-stop-shop where end-to-end transactions in relation to land are conducted.

Currently, the property records available in the system are those registered under the Nairobi Registry. The Ministry intends to update the system to include properties registered at the Central Registry (covering the Government Lands and the Land Titles Registries) and subsequently registries in other counties in Kenya.

It is worth noting that currently, not all types of land records are in the system. The system as structured only identifies properties with geospatial data. Therefore, sectional properties, such as apartments, flats are not in the system.  Nevertheless, at the property owner’s request, the properties of this nature can be surveyed and fed into the system.

The system does NOT provide for the following categories of properties: –

  • Sectional Properties
  • Properties with incomplete data records or where ownership cannot be ascertained, e.g., records that lack documentation showing how the proprietor came to own the property, e.g., letters of allotment or transfers and;
  • Properties recognized as public land and captured on the Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Illegal and Irregular Allocation of Land (Ndung’u Report) and the Revocation Gazette Notice No. 6862.
  1. Land administration services- this includes processes such as subdivision, extension of leases, change of user, consents, lease preparation, the extension of user, and renewal of leases;
  2. Physical planning services- this includes approval of part development plans, plan preparation, and issuance of certificates of compliance;
  3. Survey and mapping services such as subdivision, amalgamation, new grants, re-survey, surveying of sectional properties, extension of leases, and change of user;
  4. Valuation services – asset valuation, government leasing, government purchase, estate administration, and arbitration;
  5. Adjudication & settlement of land
  6. Land allocation services by the National Land Commission

ISSUES AFFECTING THE PLATFORM

Recently, the platform has faced harsh criticism from stakeholders due to its inefficiency in service delivery. The stakeholders claim that thousands of their transactions have been sitting in the ArdhiSasa system for the past six months, awaiting approvals with no set deadline.

The verification of original certifications submitted based on physical files that have since been stored away from the Ministry of Lands offices in Nairobi to Ruaraka is at the heart of the delay.[1] The main conflict herein is that we are still using physical verification of files on the platform which is digitized. Furthermore, the physical files are no longer at the Ministry of Lands offices. Moreover, the Ardhi Sasa system only covers Nairobi County which disadvantages stakeholders operating in other areas.

All these would have been avoided if the land records were wholly digitized. The digitization of land records was formulated back in 2013 by Charity Ngilu, Former Cabinet Secretary of Lands. It was also done in accordance with Sections 9 and 10 of the Lands Registration Act 2012.

The Law Society of Kenya through its Chairperson Eric Theuri has expressed frustrations with the platform’s efficiency. There have been doubts as to whether the Ministry can even achieve its deadline of June 2023 for digitizing all land records considering that the delays have been ongoing for years. Moreover, most stakeholders doubt the legitimacy of this platform as it has other dire issues such as the incompletion of charging of properties by the banks so they may act as security as per Section 80 of the Lands Act 2012. Numerous titles that were recorded in NAIROBI/BLOCKXX/XXX,  have

not yet been uploaded to the system and as a result, cannot be searched for or validated, making it impossible to perform due diligence on such properties.[1] This immediately contradicts Section 29 of the Land Registration Act which provides for every proprietor to have had notice of every entry in the register pertaining to land at the time of acquisition. This is mostly achieved through searches as stipulated in Section 34 of the Land Registration Act.

CONCLUSION

The land question in Kenya requires a bold and radical departure from past practice which has been deferential to property rights however acquired and neglected the grievances that people have over land. The process is likely to be contested by beneficiaries of the current system

All these issues have prompted the Law Society of Kenya to institute legal action against the Lands Ministry should they fail to digitize the land records from June 2023 and address the various issues affecting the Ardhi Sasa platform.

The Law Society is within the provisions of the Land Act and Land Registration Act of 2012 to institute such legal action.

For More Information Please Contact

Allan.mafumbo@attorneysafrica.com

Gladys.kihara@attorneysafrica.com

Mupa.mmbetsa@attorneysafrica.com


REFERENCES

Land Act 2012

Land Registration Act 2012